Add function enabled/disabled element
In previuos test applications we can check if a button is enabled or disabled. It would be a great help in our daily work
Ecasaseca 10 days ago
Add function enabled/disabled element
In previuos test applications we can check if a button is enabled or disabled. It would be a great help in our daily work
Ecasaseca 10 days ago
Provisional Pass
I have some tests which are simple Assert tests- my thought is…if the page loads and seems to have structural elements in place, it’s good. My tester selected an unstable image from a Related Posts page footer. For time pressure, I had to try to explain to my client that 12/18 was actually good. The page loads perfectly, the screenshot is beautiful, and it’s really a success by all indications. My suggestion is some rules for “Provisional Passage”, a status between Pass and Fail, where BugBug intelligently assists me. Maybe : Response code is 200 Response length is at least X, maybe 1K Response does not include phrases like “Error” Response includes at least one image or one YouTube link, which is valid.
Ken Lyle 11 days ago
Provisional Pass
I have some tests which are simple Assert tests- my thought is…if the page loads and seems to have structural elements in place, it’s good. My tester selected an unstable image from a Related Posts page footer. For time pressure, I had to try to explain to my client that 12/18 was actually good. The page loads perfectly, the screenshot is beautiful, and it’s really a success by all indications. My suggestion is some rules for “Provisional Passage”, a status between Pass and Fail, where BugBug intelligently assists me. Maybe : Response code is 200 Response length is at least X, maybe 1K Response does not include phrases like “Error” Response includes at least one image or one YouTube link, which is valid.
Ken Lyle 11 days ago
Configure browser geolocation
Please add the functionality to configure browser geolocation to a specific coordinate/region for a test/suite. This feature would be crucial to test many apps since their behaviour might be adjusted in accordance to the geolocation, and in many cases this is a regulatory requirement of certain countries/industries.
Michał Muszyński 12 days ago
Configure browser geolocation
Please add the functionality to configure browser geolocation to a specific coordinate/region for a test/suite. This feature would be crucial to test many apps since their behaviour might be adjusted in accordance to the geolocation, and in many cases this is a regulatory requirement of certain countries/industries.
Michał Muszyński 12 days ago
Design disabled group
When all the steps in a group are disabled, the group itself is shown as crossed out, just like when a single step is disabled.
Malki Vadnaï 18 days ago
Design disabled group
When all the steps in a group are disabled, the group itself is shown as crossed out, just like when a single step is disabled.
Malki Vadnaï 18 days ago
Increase file size to be uploaded or remove upload limit
We have started to create numerous tests to test our application. In one of them we want to test that a firmware uploads well to the server, but this firmware weighs 23Mb. It would be very useful for us to increase the 10Mb limit for uploading files or remove it.
Ecasaseca 22 days ago
Increase file size to be uploaded or remove upload limit
We have started to create numerous tests to test our application. In one of them we want to test that a firmware uploads well to the server, but this firmware weighs 23Mb. It would be very useful for us to increase the 10Mb limit for uploading files or remove it.
Ecasaseca 22 days ago
Ability to download results in CSV
Although the PDF is fine, the csv format would give us more possibilities to compare results over a longer period of time.
Ecasaseca 26 days ago
Ability to download results in CSV
Although the PDF is fine, the csv format would give us more possibilities to compare results over a longer period of time.
Ecasaseca 26 days ago
Review process for tests
In the case of developers, there’s a review process from their colleagues before the fix/implementation is deployed on a specific environment. Similar to them, my team of QA are using Qase as a tool to organize our test cases repository, and that tool has a review feature where a test case is created, and the person marks it for review so at least 1-2 other QA people can offer feedback. As a QA lead that already does reviews for my QA colleagues on the test cases and test plans they create, I would find it very useful to have a similar feature in Bugbug for automated tests. Here’s an example of how the flow could work: The author creates a new Bugbug test that is marked in progress (using a dedicated label maybe? or a board?) Author finishes their work and mark it as “ready for review” Optional: a project setting could allow the administrator to set the number of review approvals before the automated test is ready to be added to a testsuite The reviewer opens the automated test in a dedicated view wherethey can see all the steps similary to today, except also have an intuitive interface where they can ask for changes and offer suggestions/feedback: suggest a new selector for a step, changing waiting conditions, using a different variable, create a new group inside the test, insert components, remove steps, remove groups etc (basically all the things that can be done at the moment during a test creation) Once the review suggestions are tackled by the author, they can send the test back to “In review” or they mark the test as “Done” (I don’t have full knowledge of best practices for review process that developers do), and it appears as usually in the test repository ready to be added to a testsuite I think the views of a test “in progress/review” would differ depending on who is the “Author” and who is the “Reviewer”. As a reference here is the documentation of Qase tool and their review process: https://docs.qase.io/general/get-started-with-the-qase-platform/test-cases/test-case-review
Marius COJOCARIU 27 days ago
Review process for tests
In the case of developers, there’s a review process from their colleagues before the fix/implementation is deployed on a specific environment. Similar to them, my team of QA are using Qase as a tool to organize our test cases repository, and that tool has a review feature where a test case is created, and the person marks it for review so at least 1-2 other QA people can offer feedback. As a QA lead that already does reviews for my QA colleagues on the test cases and test plans they create, I would find it very useful to have a similar feature in Bugbug for automated tests. Here’s an example of how the flow could work: The author creates a new Bugbug test that is marked in progress (using a dedicated label maybe? or a board?) Author finishes their work and mark it as “ready for review” Optional: a project setting could allow the administrator to set the number of review approvals before the automated test is ready to be added to a testsuite The reviewer opens the automated test in a dedicated view wherethey can see all the steps similary to today, except also have an intuitive interface where they can ask for changes and offer suggestions/feedback: suggest a new selector for a step, changing waiting conditions, using a different variable, create a new group inside the test, insert components, remove steps, remove groups etc (basically all the things that can be done at the moment during a test creation) Once the review suggestions are tackled by the author, they can send the test back to “In review” or they mark the test as “Done” (I don’t have full knowledge of best practices for review process that developers do), and it appears as usually in the test repository ready to be added to a testsuite I think the views of a test “in progress/review” would differ depending on who is the “Author” and who is the “Reviewer”. As a reference here is the documentation of Qase tool and their review process: https://docs.qase.io/general/get-started-with-the-qase-platform/test-cases/test-case-review
Marius COJOCARIU 27 days ago
Image recognizion / visual assertion
Use cases: To check uploaded images, is the correct image shown? We have forms with a drawing element where users can sign their signature. Was the signature correctly saved? We can enter GPS coordinates for a site, a map is shown to show this location, is it the correct location shown on the map?
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Image recognizion / visual assertion
Use cases: To check uploaded images, is the correct image shown? We have forms with a drawing element where users can sign their signature. Was the signature correctly saved? We can enter GPS coordinates for a site, a map is shown to show this location, is it the correct location shown on the map?
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Faker data generator
It would be great to have the option of generating random names, cities, job titles and addresses, as is typical of Faker libraries.
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Faker data generator
It would be great to have the option of generating random names, cities, job titles and addresses, as is typical of Faker libraries.
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
An easier way to validate and work with table data
Use cases: In a data table for example, elements of the same type can be shown. It would be handy to be able to count the number of elements of the same type. Example 1: I added a record and I want to work on the last record/field. I don’t see a way to count the elements and then choose this number to find the last one. Example 2: I want to check the number of elements shown to check if this is the same number as what's expected. Example 3: I edited a field on the third row, after refreshing the page, I want to check if the same field in the third row was edited and has the correct value. I can find the field by value but I can’t check if it’s on the third row. Example 4: I use drag and drop to order rows, I want to check if the 6th row is correct.
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
An easier way to validate and work with table data
Use cases: In a data table for example, elements of the same type can be shown. It would be handy to be able to count the number of elements of the same type. Example 1: I added a record and I want to work on the last record/field. I don’t see a way to count the elements and then choose this number to find the last one. Example 2: I want to check the number of elements shown to check if this is the same number as what's expected. Example 3: I edited a field on the third row, after refreshing the page, I want to check if the same field in the third row was edited and has the correct value. I can find the field by value but I can’t check if it’s on the third row. Example 4: I use drag and drop to order rows, I want to check if the 6th row is correct.
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Assertions — highlighting what BugBug found
It would be great to see what BugBug finds when we use assertions on the real screenshot and highlight the element. This could be helpful when checking for elements that could be displayed multiple times on the screen, such as field validations.
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Assertions — highlighting what BugBug found
It would be great to see what BugBug finds when we use assertions on the real screenshot and highlight the element. This could be helpful when checking for elements that could be displayed multiple times on the screen, such as field validations.
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Option to highlight selector in the opened browser
Ideally, it would be possible to highlight the selector in the real browser to see exactly where it points. Right now, it’s possible to open devtools and check it only there.
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Option to highlight selector in the opened browser
Ideally, it would be possible to highlight the selector in the real browser to see exactly where it points. Right now, it’s possible to open devtools and check it only there.
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Built-in dynamic variables with configuration (like time, dates, etc.)
Sometimes, it is necessary to use dynamic parameters such as date calendars or time in tests. Currently, these scenarios can be handled using custom JavaScript variables or steps, but it would be great if built-in variables like '{{date}}' could be used with some extra UI configuration and parameterization. Some inspiration
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
Built-in dynamic variables with configuration (like time, dates, etc.)
Sometimes, it is necessary to use dynamic parameters such as date calendars or time in tests. Currently, these scenarios can be handled using custom JavaScript variables or steps, but it would be great if built-in variables like '{{date}}' could be used with some extra UI configuration and parameterization. Some inspiration
Paweł Bylina 28 days ago
In Progress
Ability to Name the "Run Custom JavaScript" Step
Hi @Paweł Bylina It would be very helpful to add an option to name or label the "Run Custom JavaScript" step. This would make it easier to identify what each script does at a glance—especially when multiple users are collaborating on the same test. Thank you.
Gizelle About 1 month ago
In Progress
Ability to Name the "Run Custom JavaScript" Step
Hi @Paweł Bylina It would be very helpful to add an option to name or label the "Run Custom JavaScript" step. This would make it easier to identify what each script does at a glance—especially when multiple users are collaborating on the same test. Thank you.
Gizelle About 1 month ago
Add one or more tests to a testsuite directly from the Repository list
At the moment, managing a testsuite is a bit of a pain due to the way the search function works inside the testsuite modal, in the sense that when searching for a specific test, the results are not “filtered”, instead if there is a matching the test is highlighted with a border. Our repository has over 350 test cases and it’s a pain to have to scroll down the list of tests in order to visually pinpoint the highlighted matched test(s). An alternative to the above for me would be the ability to add one or more selected test(s) to one or multiple testsuite(s) directly from the repository, something like this: After clicking that, a modal would appear with a list of testsuite(s), and I could select one or more testsuites from there as a destination.
Marius COJOCARIU About 1 month ago
Add one or more tests to a testsuite directly from the Repository list
At the moment, managing a testsuite is a bit of a pain due to the way the search function works inside the testsuite modal, in the sense that when searching for a specific test, the results are not “filtered”, instead if there is a matching the test is highlighted with a border. Our repository has over 350 test cases and it’s a pain to have to scroll down the list of tests in order to visually pinpoint the highlighted matched test(s). An alternative to the above for me would be the ability to add one or more selected test(s) to one or multiple testsuite(s) directly from the repository, something like this: After clicking that, a modal would appear with a list of testsuite(s), and I could select one or more testsuites from there as a destination.
Marius COJOCARIU About 1 month ago
More User Roles (View Only, Run Only, Editor)
Hi BugBug Team, I'm a QA currently using BugBug for automating our test cases. We love how intuitive and fast your tool is! However, we’d like to request additional user roles or permission levels to better fit our organisational needs. Specifically, we’d like to see roles such as: View Only – can view test cases and run history, but cannot run or edit tests Run Only – can execute tests, but cannot edit or create them Editor – can create and edit tests, but cannot execute them unless permitted In our current setup, we don’t want developers to run tests, but we do want them to view run history and test artefacts for visibility. Right now, the permissions are a bit too broad for that.
Geetha Sriram About 2 months ago
More User Roles (View Only, Run Only, Editor)
Hi BugBug Team, I'm a QA currently using BugBug for automating our test cases. We love how intuitive and fast your tool is! However, we’d like to request additional user roles or permission levels to better fit our organisational needs. Specifically, we’d like to see roles such as: View Only – can view test cases and run history, but cannot run or edit tests Run Only – can execute tests, but cannot edit or create them Editor – can create and edit tests, but cannot execute them unless permitted In our current setup, we don’t want developers to run tests, but we do want them to view run history and test artefacts for visibility. Right now, the permissions are a bit too broad for that.
Geetha Sriram About 2 months ago
Deactivate the whole test and skip test in suites
When my test fails and I don’t have time to fix it, currently I rename the test with “[To fix]” and manually remove from my test suits. I would like to have a faster action to mark the whole test as deactivated and automatically skip it in all the test suites.
Maciej Sawicki 2 months ago
Deactivate the whole test and skip test in suites
When my test fails and I don’t have time to fix it, currently I rename the test with “[To fix]” and manually remove from my test suits. I would like to have a faster action to mark the whole test as deactivated and automatically skip it in all the test suites.
Maciej Sawicki 2 months ago
JUnit xml report
Will it be possible to be able to dowload junit xml reports alongside with your pdf reports? Having the junit xml gives us the flexibility to process the report data. Also, I believe your bugbug github actions api already generates this junit reports. Having this available in your dashboard for download would be great. Thanks
Michael Jonan Naguit 3 months ago
JUnit xml report
Will it be possible to be able to dowload junit xml reports alongside with your pdf reports? Having the junit xml gives us the flexibility to process the report data. Also, I believe your bugbug github actions api already generates this junit reports. Having this available in your dashboard for download would be great. Thanks
Michael Jonan Naguit 3 months ago
Add Previous / Next navigation buttons in test run view within a suite
It would be helpful to have Previous and Next navigation buttons when viewing test run results within a suite. Currently, it's inconvenient to return to the test list each time you want to view another test, especially in suites with a large number of tests. Adding these buttons would streamline navigation and improve the overall user experience when reviewing test results.
Gizelle 3 months ago
Add Previous / Next navigation buttons in test run view within a suite
It would be helpful to have Previous and Next navigation buttons when viewing test run results within a suite. Currently, it's inconvenient to return to the test list each time you want to view another test, especially in suites with a large number of tests. Adding these buttons would streamline navigation and improve the overall user experience when reviewing test results.
Gizelle 3 months ago