Roadmap
Changelog

Have something to say?

Tell BugBug how they could make the product more useful to you.

Ability to manipulate steps of a components from the "Components" section

An improvement idea that I would find useful would be the ability to manipulate a component directly from the "Components" section. Right now if I click the "Edit component" button I am asked to navigate to one of the tests that contains it, and edit the component there.It would be much quicker if I could just manipulate the component directly from this dedicated section, without the need to go to a test:I think all the actions available in a test could be made available here as well, editing, deleting a step, copying etc. ^

Marius COJOCARIU 3 days ago

SMS Feature

Similar to the bugbug email/inbox feature, I would love to have a randomly generated SMS number that I can use to test our notifications. Having an SMS inbox where I can verify that the message is correct & even send replies like STOP or YES to verify other functionality would be a chef's kiss. I would also be okay with having a "dedicated" sms number instead of a new and random one. Maybe give us one per account with the ability to add more as add-ons.

Brian Batt 6 days ago

1

Select and add multiple components through the "Insert existing component" Modal

Hello. When I create my test cases, despite having a lot of options for creating them, I still feel the necessity of having a more efficient way to add multiple components to my tests. Let me explain. I'm referring to the modal below:IssueI'm inside a test and I want to add multiple components but currently, I'm only able to select one each time. SuggestionAdd a multi-selection option in the modal, for example, So I can easily add as many components as I would like in my test, instead of opening the modal multiple times to add them. Not sure if this is align with the feature suggestion mentioned here https://feedback.bugbug.io/p/ability-to-add-the-same-component-to-the-test-multiple

Wilker Augusto 12 days ago

Dedicated BugBug desktop app for Win/Linux/Mac

I know that almost everything is being done inside a web browser nowadays, which is great. But I tend to lose myself between tabs quite often (this is a problem with me and not with BugBug 😛), which is why I prefer to use desktop applications whenever that is possible, example for Slack, Zoom, , Discord, Notion, Linear, Spotify etc So it would be nice and interesting to have a dedicated desktop application for BugBug. But at the same time I'm aware this is definetely a very picky feature request, and one that would bring the least amount of value I think.

Marius COJOCARIU 18 days ago

2

More customization options for "Variables" section

I would find it very useful to be able to have more control over the "Variables" section content, more precisely on the way to view the data in here. At the moment the data in these tabs have their items as "fixed" cards:"Built-in Variables""Custom variables""Profiles"This view is really rigid and I can't organize it intuitively according to my needs.I would like to be able to do at least one (more is better) action from the following:Display as a list + filteringDisplay as a table + filteringDrag and drop itemsOrganize per folderMy use case is the following: I currently use a very important component for initiating a specific set of variables. These variables are used in almost 50 different tests, but their values are static, so the same at all times no matter the test being executed (they are basically First/Last names for certain entities).My issue is that this component keeps expanding, it currently has 28 steps, each one a variable, and they are currently being initialized at the beginning of each of these 50 tests.I was thinking that since they are static values, I could migrate them from this component inside the "Variables" section of my project, so that I save up on execution time without a need to keep initializing them in each test.But moving 28 new variables in the "Custom variables" tab would make this section quite difficult to manage and filter without any options to organize it to my needs.Even without these new 28 variables, at the moment the "Custom variables" is quite difficult to organize since this is the place where we put our test account emails, environment urls, and other important information.I would like to be able to organize this section easier and better. With this, I would actually change my mindset on initializing my static variables using this dedicated section, instead of pilling them inside components.

Marius COJOCARIU 19 days ago

6

Expanding Keyboard Shortcuts for all recording actions

We now have the option to use thortcuts Alt+1 = "Add assert" and Alt+2 = "Add hover" during recording. These are extremly useful in my case because they help to avoid accidental closing of modals or elements that dissappear on clicking outside of them. Next, it would be handy to expand these stortcuts to the rest of the actions.I think continuing the Alt+number format would be useful, for example:

Marius COJOCARIU 19 days ago

2

Ability to manipulate recorded steps before confirming them

After finishing a recording session, the recorded steps appear with a border inside a test and there are two options: Delete or Confirm. However these 2 actions will apply to all recorded steps.It would be nice to have more control here before confirmation, such as moving recorded steps around (maybe limited inside the "recording" border), and deleting one or more steps, before final confirmation.I noticed this mainly because interacting with the bugbug recording menu will register clicks which will sometimes close modals in our software, but I think there is already a different feedback on this one. 😛

Marius COJOCARIU 25 days ago

5

remember profile per signed in team user

When my colleague and I run the same tests with different profiles (one for his local setup and one for mine), the profile selection is set to whatever the last one one was. I suspect this is set on the test and does not factor in the logged in user.It is a bit irritating to run the test and they fail to run because of this oversight.

Mike Sutton 30 days ago

2

Cancel/stop old suite if a new suite is triggered

UseCase: Developer A merged pull request ACI/CD triggered running BugBug tests in the cloud - Suite1Developer B merged pull request B 1 minute after Developer ACI/CD triggered running BugBug tests in the cloud again (Suite2), but the new app version has been deployed, so old tests are irrelevant and should be canceledIn this case, it would be nice to stop Suite 1 when Suite 2 has started.

Paweł Bylina About 1 month ago

Deleting deactivated steps with one or few clicks.

Adding possibility to delete deactivated steps with one or a few clicks by introducing Select deactivated or Delete all deactivated button. Currently, to do so, there is a need to select deactivated steps one by one and then click Delete in steps selected. This is not user friendly while working with a large number of steps.

Michał Rygoł About 1 month ago

Performance / load test

Can we have a performance / load test feature in BugBug, to ensure that our application will meet the service levels expected in production as well as to deliver a positive user experience. With the option to choose how many virtual users should be running and to generate a performance report.It would also be great to have a graph/raw data that shows how a single test perform over time, to see the if the test is getting slower or not.

Christian Wethje About 1 month ago

1